https://blog.victorypackaging.com/hs-fs/hubfs/Blog_images/Blog_Fruit%20and%20Veg%20Packaging.jpg?width=1024&name=Blog_Fruit%20and%20Veg%20Packaging.jpg |
There are many different types of package in use throughout the world. Packaging for fresh produce is of several types :
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRLcAXWcYvsIQGpyWBcP00RK99LOlGc4szwxdea H2SsgdADch9BlwU2ohtAgjX2ULuuqrg&usqp=CAU |
The advantages of using sacks and nets are merely financial. The sacks and nets are cheap, have a low weight/volume ratio and, if made of a synthetic material, will not rot. The disadvantages include a low protection against puncturing, compression, vibration and impact injuries such as dropping, difficult stacking, and the need of special stitching equipment. In general, nets are only suitable for hard produce such as coconuts and root crops (potatoes, onions).
https://media.istockphoto.com/photos/fruits-and-vegetables-in-a-wooden-crate-on-white-background-picture-id953006520 |
The advantages of wooden crates are:
1. The crates can be manufactured and repaired locally.
2. Wood is relatively resistant to different weather conditions and water.
3. Wooden crates are often reused and have a higher efficiency for larger
fruits, e.g. watermelons.
4. Most crates have good ventilation.
Disadvantages of wooden crates are:
1. Untreated wood can easily become contaminated with fungi and bacteria.
2. Treatment of wooden crates with paint or other chemicals may cause
produce deterioration.
3. The material may be too hard or rough for produce like soft fruits, and
therefore liners of a soft material may be needed.
4. Manufacturing of wooden crates puts an extra claim on the natural forest resources.
https://5.imimg.com/data5/SELLER/Default/2021/8/QN/JK/EO/9344673/corrugated-fruit-packaging-cardboard-box-500x500.jpg |
Advantages of solid fibreboard boxes:
• Low weight and easy to handle
.
• The box can have any design, although it is recommended to use sizes
fitting on the standard design of pallets.
• The boxes are delivered flat and assembling boxes can be done locally.
• The box has a low purchase cost.
Disadvantages of solid fibreboard boxes:
• Moisture and high humidity can seriously weaken the box. Washed
produce should be made free from surface moisture before putting it into
the box. Empty boxes should be stored in a dry place preferably flat on top
of pallets and not for long periods of time.
• The low rigidity causes the lower stacking strength compared to wooden or
plastic crates. The fibre-board boxes are easily damaged by rough handling
and ropes and too much weight on top of the box can crush the perishable
produce inside.
• Ventilation holes are usually small, because large holes would seriously
influence the strength of the box. It is advised that the hole surfaces area is
kept at least 5 percent of the total surface area of the box. Decreasing the
size of the holes by not properly closing telescope boxes or not properly
stacking the boxes will decrease heat exchange, resulting in higher
temperatures of the produce and increased spoilage. Vertical oblong slots,
instead of round holes, have the advantage that the hole stays partly open
even when the telescope box lid is not completely closed.
• The boxes are not re-usable.
Corrugated Fiberboard (CFB): Corrugated fiberboard is manufactured in
many different styles and weights. Because of its relativity low cost and
versatility, it is the popular produce container material and will probably
remain so in the near future. The flat surfaces of CFB boxes are known as
‘face’ and the corrugated surfaces are known as ‘flutes’. The strength of CFB
primarily depends on the GSM (g/m2
) of kraft paper used, no. of flutes/ meter
and the height of the flutes.
The advantages of corrugated fiberboard boxes are:
Low weight, easy to handle, cushioning effect due to relatively soft walls. The
CFB box can be fabricated to any design, the boxes are delivered flat and
assembling of boxes can be done locally. They also have good printability.
Above all they are most eco-friendly package due to their biodegradability.
However, low rigidity and poor stacking strength, high moisture absorbance,
and low re-usability are the major disadvantages of CFB boxes. While
packaging of fresh horticultural commodities, attention must be given for
proper gaseous exchanges by providing required ventilation holes. As a rule,
ventilation area should be at least 5 per cent of the total outer surface area of
the box. Vertical/ oblong slots are better than round holes. Sometimes coatings
with wax or poly linings are also used in CFB boxes in order to make them
moisture proof.
5. Plastic Crates:
https://img3.exportersindia.com/product_images/bc-full/2018/7/5169758/fruit-vegetable-plastic-crate-1532584561-4138263.jpeg |
In general, plastic crates are more expensive than wooden crates or carton boxes, initially but in long run they work out to be cheaper because of their more usability and longer life span. Plastic crates are usually made of highdensity polyethylene (HDPE) or polypropylene (PP).
Advantages of plastic crates:
• As a strong, rigid crate, these plastic crates can be used for many journeys,
making the cost per journey relatively low.
• Different sizes and shapes are available to suit different customer needs.
Colours can be used for marketing purposes.
• The containers are easy to clean and disinfect.
Plastic crates are strong and water resistant and therefore, the containers can be
used in humid areas and during hydro cooling.
Disadvantages of plastic crates:
• The hard surfaces can damage the produce and it is advised to use liners at
the bottom and side.
• The high purchase cost combined with the risk of pilferage could make this
type of crate a financial risk.
• Because this crate can be used several times, the extra cost for the return
trip should be included in the total running cost.
Let us sum up:
Adopting improved packaging, handling and transportation methods can successfully avert huge post harvest losses. The product requirements, the marketing system and the personnel preference will determine the type of packaging to use.
1. Cornelis, C.M., Schuur (1988) Packaging for fruits, vegetables and root
crops. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations,
Bridgetown, Barbados.
2. Er. B. Pantasico (Eds.) (1975) Post harvest physiology, handling and
utilization of tropical and subtropical fruits and vegetables. AVI Publishing
Co.
3. Roy, S.K., Pal, R.K. and Sen, Nita (2000) Packaging technology for fruits,
vegetables and their products. In Post harvest technology of fruits and
vegetables. Indus Publishing company. New Delhi.
4. Thomsan, A.K. (1996) Post harvest technologies of fruits and vegetables
Eds. Blackwell Science Ltd.
5. Wills, R.B.H., McGlasson, W.B., Graham, D., Lee, T.H. and Hall, E.G.
(1996) Post Harvest. An introduction to the physiology and handling of
fruits and vegetables. CBS Publishers and Distributors, Delhi.